Love and money

How many marital relations were upset because of financial disputes. And the reason is again in psychology. Every person seems to have been deceived, That everything is not in his favor, but in favor of a partner. Because I remember everything in my favor. But the partner also remembers everything in his favor. And there is a conflicting mood. What to do? Yes, everything is quite simple: you need to keep housekeeping accounts. On whom and how much does the family leave? What income? Spend extra time on writing in the "ledger", and everything will be easy to calculate. Before making a claim, calculate the "quiet".And suddenly it turns out that there is more to me. So it's time to start a scandal not for me, but for me. If you conduct a "ledger", then a mutual exchange of information on the issues of income and expenses is ensured.

But if you do not lead a "ledger", then mutual deception is facilitated."I hid my income," and "I hid my expenses."I knew one pair. His wife bought unused skirts for unaccounted money. And her husband had "subcutaneous", in his terminology, money, and already he, with two same friends, organized, in his terminology, a "brothel".That is, was rented a studio apartment, which, in his terminology, was a hunting lodge. Well, they all know that those who leave the hunting lodge leave edible supplies for possible cases for the next hunters, just in case. Well, our hunters for each other and for a friend left balychok, cognac, so that it was easier to clink glasses, before pecking at the brotherhood.."For three" to drink a cuckoo - it used to be, under authoritarian Soviet rule, but now this kind of democracy has been dissolved: for three - a hunting lodge. Well, all right, I do not blame anyone and for anything, I just say how it is. Ato, as it is, does not promote trust.

Let's return to the "extra" skirt. Of course, we take into account that a woman needs to spend more on a woman than on a man. But how much? At 20% or twice. .. 30% or three times. .. But not to the insanity. Agree.

Seryozha told his wife Svetlana that, they say, today we go to the theater. He assumed that Sveta would be terribly pleased. And she said:

- And what can I order to go to the theater? The black evening dress was out of fashion. White evening - crawled on the seam. .. And what is ordered, not yet ready. Well, I'll go in panties, this is the only decent thing that I have.

And you will not refuse Svetlana in wit, if not in wit. All this depends on the psychotype. But if you judge psychologically, of course, the hysteroid will go away anyway more than the epileptic. Well, so marry an epileptic. But even a hysterical woman should think of some of the convolutions of the left hemisphere( right-it's just for aesthetics) that one should not ruin a generally acceptable marriage in general because of the nonsense. ..

Financial problems rest against one more thing. It is generally accepted that if a wife does not work outside the family, then her husband "contains".There are humiliating phrases: "loss of a breadwinner", "wife on a dependent husband".At the same time in the Khrushchev era, when the "law on parasitism" was in effect, the wife of the "dependent" was not considered a parasitic vetka. And then the parasites, that is, people who did not work for the state, were imprisoned. Not for long. But zatb - the poets. The outstanding poet Joseph Brodsky, for example, was imprisoned. And then his wife was recognized as a man. Well, Khrushchev Well, the humanist Brodsky planted, and the wife and the person for the person still held. Forgive me for my sarcasm - I do not like Khrushchev with his law on parasitism and with his "communism" promised to the people in twenty years, but I do not really like anything other sovereigns either. Almost all of them care about their well-being and painfully little - about the welfare of the people. Well, is it possible to raise a child for three years of unpaid leave? How unintelligible Russian princes are to women's labor for the creation of citizens. They only give recruits, and they regard women as mothers of recruits. At best, they talk about labor reserves( and that's bread, though not about the meat of the Puschetta meat).And the more cunning in the speeches use the phrase "human factor".

They unfairly believe that it is up to the nurturing and educating people themselves to save the nurturing and educating people. Well, the devil with them, with those state men who give "alms" in 70 rubles a month for a child and 40 rubles a mother "single".First, for me, if the mother, then no longer alone. She has a child, a daughter, a son. And second, on the

te at temples and simply compassionate Muscovites give more. Look at this topic is another transfer of Veronika Borovik Khilchevskaya about the beggarly mafia that plunderes the mendicants, but they are given so much that there are still five hundred rubles a day. And agree with me that with those who have identified mothers of 70 rubles, not God, but the devil.

Well, if you are human? We give birth to children, we grow, we bring up for self-expression, self-affirmation, self-realization. What kind of humanity is this that does not reproduce itself? So it's okay, God be with them, with the sovereigns, at the Last Judgment he will deal with them, with their diabolical affairs - 70-40 rubles for maternity work. And we ourselves will sort out each other. We, my husband and my wife, it became clear that without a child - this is what a family, empty troubles, and only. Forgive me, dear parents that have not taken place, if I have touched your good feelings and your sufferings."I'm not a magician, I'm just learning," but I still can probably help you in conceiving your desired child. And not fashionable now artificial insemination and surrogate motherhood, and calculations.

But both spouses decided for themselves that the child is happiness. Then the immediate actions for the child, which the husband, working outside the family, can not do - on his wife. So is not this a job? That is, even if the wife does not bring money to the house, but leads this family home, is it not labor? And it is not an insult to call her a dependent.