Men are three times more likely than women to remarry

Socrates:

- Do you think women get divorced, wanting to live out of wedlock or hoping for a better marriage?

Chorus( with a sigh):

- Hope. .. Socrates:

- They know about the ratio of two to three, that is, that the wife is twice as likely to be divorced and three times less likely to remarry?

Choir:

- No, they do not.

Socrates:

- Would you know about this formula "two by three" - divorced with greater circumspection or with less?

Chorus( with even deeper sigh):

- With more. ..

But while women do not know this ratio, they are therefore divorced with less circumspection. But in vain. Because to this formula "TWO-THREE" you need to know more and this is what. With a child it is more difficult to get married( with two - even harder).And, by the way, getting married with his son, it is more difficult to keep this second family than marrying his daughter. A wonderful film "The thief" Chukhrayasyn. Remember, what Sanya goes to fight for his mother with Tolyan, who plays an actor Vladimir Mashkov. There, however, the victory went to the "stepfather", but if everything did not end so tragically, in the end it could end all the same dramatically.

And men do not know about this formula "TWO-THREE".Although, knowing they are more likely to find a replacement, they could kind of get divorced with more activity. But they are divorced with greater circumspection than women. Because there's a hell of a dozen reasons for that.

For greater solidity of the book we formalize the presentation: we list the reasons for the numbers,

CAUSE №

There is a large scientist biologist - Vigen Geodakyan. He drew attention to the fact that men differ by any sign more than women. For example, bald and shaggy more among men. More talents in science and more oligophrenics are also among men. The more inveterate scoundrels are more among men. But there are more moral geniuses too. At men all so. Even shorties are bigger, but bigger and lanky.

Let's build curves( we, however, have direct curves, but they are still called "curves").Take the best( in the opinion of the people) husbands and the worst. We connect them with a line.

The most good husbands and earn, and raise children, and look outwardly not bad. Well, the worst - and irresponsible, and the fathers are useless, and zamoryshi to the form. ..

And now take the most good and the worst wives. We will connect them.

And here on the direct "curved" lines it is clearly visible that women are "averaged", that the worst from the best differs much less than the worst - from the best.

Well, how will the marriages be built? Who marries whom and who marries whom? I think that your guess here will match mine, because the truth lies right under your feet, on the grass. .. The pairs will settle approximately like this.

Alas, some women who are in the extreme right position, do not want to be married at all, because for them there are "completely lost", like Huckleberry Finn.

And it can be like this, so, so or so.

But hardly such a marriage is possible. ..

Let's return to more typical combinations.

What follows from these sociological patterns? Psychological patterns follow."I," says the wife, "are not much worse than she", and "her husband is much better than mine."

And immediately the conclusion: impression: fate is unfair to me. And so fate drags to divorce. Recall, the Roman philosopher of Seneca in the century AD said that intelligent fate leads, and a fool drags. This is one of the reasons that the proportion of women's and men's initiatives in divorce is not 5050, but 6832.

I did not specifically say "leads" and specifically said "drags".Not only to quote the most subtle philosopher of Seneca. I wanted to emphasize this, that the psychological force caused by these relationships is insurmountable.

We emphasize once again that this is only one of the reasons that distorts the "ideal" proportion of fifty-fifty. Each of the reasons set forth hereafter still slightly distorts the proportion of 5050 and brings it closer to 6832. But the amount is very important.

REASON # 2

I continue to question Socrates in the role of

. Whose decisions are, in principle, as they say now, "weighted"?Male or female? Whose is more rational, and whose is more emotional?

Chorus is responsible:

- Male solutions are more often more rational, female ones are more emotional. ..

I agree with the conclusion of Hor, though with some amendments. A woman is really more emotional, if we talk about the mobility of emotions. She can easily cry, but the transition from sincere tears to sincere laughter - this is also a woman. However, men are more emotional in the sense that they have more power of emotional experience. Men's emotions are more energetic. So, the stress caused by the rupture of relationships in men is stronger. .. But for decision-making it is motility of emotions that is important. The resentment flared up. There is no reasonable reflection that the gap is fraught with many difficulties. And here is the solution: divorce. And he draws a lot of minuses in front of him, compares them with the number of pluses."Weighs". .. And it becomes clear to him that all the same: "we stay together."

CAUSE №3

Continuing the "Socratic" dialogue, ask the following question:

- At a young age who looks more attractive to the opposite sex: a woman or a man? A?After leaving the ugly duckling?

Answer:

of course, a woman. ..

At sixteen-eighteen-eighteen, - both women and men answer.

Well, and he at this age still barely gets out of this state of the ugly duckling. I conducted a survey of women of all ages on this. Swan, he will, according to 85% of women, at thirty. Approximately, just to clarify the idea, draw a graph of this process. Exact research is hardly needed here. But on express questions on mass lectures it looks something like this:

Well, what of it? But what. .. The girl is pleasant to her peers and peers of her husband. And they show her increased interest and. .. increased complaisance( they are not married to her) and also seem to her better. But her tender looks and affectionate hands and older men draw to her - motherly, status, money, with connections, with experience in sex, many who have seen, able to tell about what they saw, who solved the damned apartment problem. And they are more competitive in the "love market" compared to its peers. And even those

who are seriously older. .. Some of them have achieved such a high position in life that "with you on the block, if so". ..

So its higher compared with the husband sex appeal for people of the opposite sex providesshe had greater success than her husband.