You asked the child before his birth, does he want to appear in the light of day?no?not asked?
Well, he could not have answered. Toto and it. Only then do not forget that it is you and only you are responsible for his appearance. And if you agree with Antoine de Saint-Exupery, that we are responsible for the person who was tamed, then for the one who was taken from non-existence in his tender embrace, we are answering a hundredfold. .. Mama is more important: she points to the window of the maternity homeA review of the kulechek, in which the fanned cams. Nothing, he will later show them to you, if you keep him in captivity diapers and diapers. And then, you still keep him in moral slavery: do not paint on the walls, do not take scissors. He will demand freedom.
It's all about it. Dad and Mom, who are twenty-five and then thirty-five. Grandmothers, whose forty-fifty. And if my grandmother ever under-educated her child with her example, maybe she will show these lines to her daughters-sons, parents of grandsons of granddaughters? And will they fix the matter together?
Someone will say that, they say, your Katya - four. But what about the ten-year-old "leader of the Redskins". .. Not in the order of a prick, but in a compassionate sobbing I will say that I had to do everything as I said, at the age of three, and at the age of three months. And even in the "minus-month-old age"( remember the father's hands on the belly of a pregnant wife?).But something can be done in the transitional 3-4 years. Only then you will have to step on the throat of your own song regarding the relationship of your child in the circle of peers."Do not be friends with her, she's from a bad family.""Do not bring to our house - steal something else."Do not make friends? Do not bring? And you, as parents did something to expand and improve the circle, from which the teenager could choose friends? Did not, did not even think? Well, think and do it.
I have cited many examples of the logic of the language in Katya. But I'll take the same from other children. One girl with a reproach: if you "sleep", then "drink", and if I "sleep", then "splash".A boy of five years old: "let's go and have an ax."Well, because if you saw - from the "saw", then from the "ax" - an ax. Children in the three-year period, as I have already explained, have learned the logic, but have not yet mastered the alogisms. But at the age of ten, the children reason like this: